Doubt that the pull out from Iraq was for purely political purposes?

24 Oct

Agree or disagree about whether the war in Iraq was a worthwhile mission, the fact that the Obama campaign came out the day after the announcement of exit from that nation with this email removes any doubt that Obama did this to try to motivate his base.



Friend –I’m James Kvaal, the new policy director for President Obama’s 2012 campaign. You’ll be hearing from me occasionally about the President’s policies and those of our opponents, and how we can all help bring about change for our country.

Yesterday, we accomplished one major change when President Obama announced that all American troops in Iraq will be home before the holidays.

With that action, the Iraq war will end. And one of the President’s central promises will have been kept.

Both as Americans and as supporters of President Obama, this is something for us to reflect on, and be proud of.

Watch the video of the President’s announcement — then please pass this on:

The war in Iraq was a divisive, defining issue in our country for nearly nine years, and was the catalyst for many Americans to get involved in politics for the first time.Now, thanks to the actions of this President, we can say that conflict is coming to a close.

The end of this war reflects a larger transition in our foreign policy as, in the President’s words, “the tide of war is receding.” The drawdown in Iraq has allowed us to refocus on the fight against al Qaeda, even as we begin to bring troops home from Afghanistan. And of course, this week also marked the definitive end of the Qaddafi regime in Libya.

These outcomes are an example of what happens when a leader sets a plan and sees it through. In the last campaign, the President committed to getting American troops home while leaving behind a stable and secure Iraq. You rallied around that vision, and now that promise has been fulfilled.

On behalf of this campaign and supporters of the President across the country, I want to thank the more than 1 million Americans who have served in Iraq, and all those who worked to make this possible.



James Kvaal
Policy Director
Obama for America

Notice that although there is a hollow sounding ‘thanks to the troops’ in the message, there is no recognition of the over 4,400 dead Americans and the 32,000 + wounded in this effort to bring about a safer middle east at a very high price.  There is no mention of the removal of the tyrant, Saddam Hussein, in an orderly fashion unlike the pack of rabid dogs that tortured and murdered Libya’s Qaddafi.   Don’t get me wrong.  I’m not shedding a tear for old Moammar, but Obama’s foreign policy is creating even more instability throughout the region, ushering in God knows what in the future, but for him to take a victory lap after that disturbing image of mob savagery is just sick.
But the Obama campaign needed to precipitate a hasty pullout in order to motivate his left wing base. 
I am glad the troops are coming home, as I don’t want them in harm’s way serving for a Commander-in-Chief that is reckless and irresponsible, and who doesn’t seem to grasp any of the benefits that came from the Iraq campaign.
I don’t wish to get into a debate about the merits of the Iraq mission in this post.  I just fear that any gains that these brave men and women have sacrificed to obtain have been cavalierly tossed aside in favor of Obama’s political ambition.
The fact that this email was issued the very next day proves that this is all about politics and nothing more.
It is simply shameful and proves that this man will stop at nothing to get re-elected.

2 responses to “Doubt that the pull out from Iraq was for purely political purposes?

  1. R.H.F. (@LoudAmerican)

    October 24, 2011 at 9:23 am

    AT THIS POINT IN TIME – what does it matter?
    SO WHAT? the left blames the little Bush – but that’s normal for them – they use selective memory
    They disregard the fact the most politicians on the left were in support and accepted the SAME INTEL that the little Bush had … but it’s Bush’s fault … Obama would never do something THAT grievous (even if he did LITERALLY invade Pakistan to kill Bin Laden)

    The point toward the top of this page said: “Obama did this to try to motivate his base”

    99.5% of all American’s fail to see that Obama’s game is to pull heart strings …
    1) find every bleeding heart cause (justifiable or not) that is seeking JUST US (and not Justice for all)
    2) find their loudest issue (they tout support for it)
    3) step up and present yourself as a supporter (create a kindred spirit slanted warm and fuzzies)
    4) once elected – find the warm and fuzzies that have the largest voter groups and show boat your efforts in being a part of the fella’s … so the vote flips your way
    5) when finished with #4 and won most of that voter pocket – continue to repeat #4 until you have more to new one’s

    SO – WHEN ASKED “Did Obama do this to try to motivate his base”

    Do ya’ think he did? It was the same as the left and right supporting the attack on Afghanistan

    Point to concern ones self with is on the ONE UP’S … the liberal right (yes – I did say RIGHT!) is just sitting there squabbling and offering no solutions …

    They aren’t coming off the mountain and reaching the people …. we of moderate conservative values have nothing!

  2. Saddlesore

    October 24, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    Obama is also going to use this as an excuse for deep cuts in defense spending that will go far beyond the actual savings of pulling out of Iraq. He thinks that for him this is a two-fer, but for the country it will just put us at further risk.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: